Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Controller Hiring topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Osage County selects BirdDog recruiting to search for county controller

Osage County Board of Commissioners · February 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a lengthy discussion about cost, duties and whether the county needs a controller, the Osage County Board voted Feb. 10 to accept a BirdDog Recruitment and Consulting proposal (pending legal review) to search for a county controller; commissioners discussed fees and the role’s expected responsibilities.

The Osage County Board of Commissioners voted Feb. 10 to accept a proposal from BirdDog Recruitment and Consulting to conduct the county controller recruitment, pending legal review of the engagement contract.

Staff presented two proposals: Premier/Key Staffing, a $22,500 flat fee with a 50%-of-fee charge for a replacement search if a hire fails within 90 days; and BirdDog Recruitment and Consulting, a percentage-based placement fee (about 20% of the first-year salary, which the board discussed as roughly $20,000–$28,000 depending on the eventual salary) with BirdDog offering a free replacement search if a new hire leaves within 90 days.

Commissioners debated whether Osage County needs a full-time controller. Staff described the controller role as a statutory option that functions as a front-line chief financial officer: managing county financial affairs, payroll, accounts payable, benefits, assistance with budget preparation, and day-to-day financial administration — functions that have historically been handled in part by the county clerk and outside consultants.

One commissioner said the county currently pays third-party consultants and that a full-time employee could reduce those recurring costs. Another raised concerns about adding a high-salary position and the likely need for staff under a controller, which would increase recurring budgetary obligations.

After discussing the differences in guarantee and replacement terms, a commissioner moved to accept BirdDog’s proposal pending legal review of a final engagement contract. The motion was seconded, commissioners voted by voice and the motion carried.

What happens next: legal staff will review the proposed contract and, if acceptable, staff will proceed with BirdDog’s recruitment services to identify and screen candidates for the county controller role.