Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Systems topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Osage Beach aldermen weigh changing who pays for and maintains water pressure regulators
Summary
City staff reported six pressure‑related claims since 2019 and noted insurers decline coverage beyond city pits. Aldermen debated keeping the current loaner program and grandfathering existing customers versus returning responsibility to property owners; staff will draft alternative ordinance language.
Mayor Ross convened extended discussion about the city’s practice of supplying and servicing pressure‑reducing valves (PRVs), a device meant to protect private plumbing from high mains pressure.
The issue surfaced after staff notified the board that, starting July 1, the city planned to stop providing new PRVs and instead provide short‑term loaners. Madeline Moon, the human resources director, had located records showing six claims related to excess water pressure from 2019–2023 and a total city payout of about $2,900 in one instance. Caleb, a utilities operations employee, told the board that “roughly 30% of our callouts after hours are related to pressure” and recounted a winter when crews replaced roughly 70 PRVs after freezing damage.
A central insurance concern drove much of the debate. Moon and Jeff Fisher, public works director, said the city’s property‑liability advisers had cautioned against assuming liability for damages that occur beyond the publicly controlled pit area. Fisher said his office learned NPR (the insurer/advisory group referenced) "would not cover damages beyond the pit." Alderman Rucker emphasized that insurers declining coverage “doesn’t mean we wouldn’t have liability,” but it leaves the city financially exposed if a claim is filed and coverage is denied.
Alderman Hoffman proposed a compromise: continue to provide PRVs for existing customers (grandfathered) and require new construction to place PRVs inside the home or business, while allowing the city to install loaner devices and to charge customers for replacement PRVs if desired. Fisher confirmed operational options when a PRV fails: the city can shut service off until a plumber arrives, straight‑pipe so customers temporarily receive mainline pressure, or install a loaner PRV for up to 60 days at no charge.
Several aldermen asked staff to cost out the fiscal impact of continuing current service levels versus creating a city maintenance program. Alderman George and others pressed for clarity on the number and age of existing PRVs; Fisher estimated many were installed in the 2003–2005 timeframe and that replacement costs have risen substantially in recent years.
The board directed staff to prepare alternative ordinance language and cost estimates so members can consider a formal change. Mayor Ross and aldermen asked for written suggestions and invited Aldermen Hoffman and Rucker to work with staff on a proposed compromise for review by the next Wednesday.
