Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic‑district reviewers urge major redesign for Old Post Road rezoning; board continues SEQRA review
Summary
Members of the Bedford Village Historic District Review Commission told the Planning Board the conceptual rezoning and mixed‑use plans for 633–647 Old Post Road are out of scale and risk diluting village character; the board paused Part 3 SEQRA review and continued the hearing so the applicant can provide more detailed plans and traffic/engineering responses.
Clayton Rose, chair of the Bedford Village Historic District Review Commission, told the Bedford Planning Board the conceptual rezoning and mixed‑use proposal for 633–647 Old Post Road in Bedford Village “lacks compatibility with the established character, scale and material integrity of Bedford Village Historic District.” He delivered his commission’s preliminary review at a continued public hearing, urging the planning board to treat siting, scale and massing as paramount.
The review commission, which consulted the National Register nomination and the Secretary of the Interior’s standards, recommended design changes before the town issues any SEQRA negative declaration. “The proposed monolithic structure is significantly broader and taller than any contributing building in the district,” the commission’s letter concluded, citing concerns about setting, feeling and association.
Attorney Daniel Hollis, representing the applicant, pressed the board to keep the current session focused on SEQRA’s environmental question: whether the rezoning would cause significant adverse environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated. “What we’re here for is whether or not…there are no significant adverse environmental impacts that can either be mitigated or eliminated,” Hollis said, noting that detailed site plans, elevations and renderings would follow any rezoning and would be subject to historic‑district certificate review.
Board members repeatedly raised the policy question of rezoning’s permanence and precedent, cautioning that changing a parcel from a residential zone to a neighborhood business district can alter development economics and expectations. Several members said they want more evidence that the applicant will meaningfully alter scale, materials and setbacks before clearing the environmental review and allowing the rezoning to advance to the town board.
Given outstanding engineering and traffic analyses and differing interpretations of applicable zoning maps, the Planning Board voted to adjourn and continue the public hearing to their next meeting so the applicant can submit additional materials and the board can consider whether a negative or positive SEQRA declaration is warranted.
Next steps: the applicant will supply more complete drawings, and the Planning Board will reconvene the Part 3 review. The historic district commission said it will make further comments once revised materials are available.
