Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hillsborough Conservation Commission flags wetland and drainage concerns for proposed five‑lot subdivision at 109 Jones Road

Hillsborough Conservation Commission · November 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission reviewed plans for a proposed five‑lot major subdivision at 109 Jones Road and authorized Vice‑Chair James McDonough (or his designee) to comment to the Planning Board, citing concerns about stormwater drainage, wetlands, wildlife corridor impacts, steep slopes and glacial geologic features.

During continued correspondence the Hillsborough Conservation Commission reviewed plans submitted to the Planning Board for a major subdivision at 109 Jones Road (M 8, L 111). Commissioners noted the proposal would create five lots of approximately 2.5 acres each and raised concerns about storm drainage and potential impacts to wetlands on and adjacent to the property.

Commissioners also observed that the site functions as a wildlife corridor adjacent to Fox Forest and is in proximity to Cottrell Forest; they noted steep slopes and the presence of glacial erratics and associated plant and animal communities that could be sensitive to development. James McDonough reported that an abutter had expressed drainage concerns to him.

Jim Riddle moved to authorize Vice‑Chair James McDonough or his designee to provide comments and to speak on behalf of the HCC to the Planning Board on these conservation issues; Jim Narloch seconded. The motion passed 5-0 after Chair Richard Head recused himself and left the meeting at 7:45 p.m.

The commission’s authorization gives the Planning Board a conservation perspective from the HCC focused on wetlands, stormwater management, wildlife connectivity and slope/geomorphology concerns; the minutes do not record specific technical recommendations or final comments, and the body did not take a formal vote to oppose the subdivision.