Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Judicial Complaint Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit report on judicial complaint process deadlocks committee; motion to file fails 6-6
Summary
A September 11 audit of the judicial complaint process produced extended debate; efforts to acknowledge and file the report failed on a 6-6 tie and a motion to bring the Judicial Standards Commission back to the December meeting also failed by tie.
The Legislative Audit Committee spent the late afternoon of Sept. 11 debating an audit of the judicial complaint process (23P-03) and failed to take formal action after a pair of tied voice votes.
Tina Chamberlain presented the report and representatives of the judicial branch, including Chief Justice Mike McGrath and Court Administrator Beth McLaughlin, answered questions on caseloads, jurisdictional authority, rules and commission compensation. Committee members pressed for clarification on the Judicial Standards Commission’s processes and whether the commission’s rules had been reviewed elsewhere.
Rep. Emma Kerr-Carpenter initially moved the committee’s standard acknowledgement motion but later withdrew it amid procedural questions. At 17:42:13 Rep. Kerr-Carpenter again moved that the committee acknowledge receipt of the audit report and distribute copies in accordance with law; the voice vote was tied 6-6 and the motion failed. Chair Jason Ellsworth then moved to have the Judicial Standards Commission return to the December committee meeting; that voice vote also tied 6-6 and failed.
Legislative Auditor Angus Maciver and others clarified the division’s work and the difference between audit findings and agency reactions. Committee members discussed tabling the report and bringing JSC back for further review, but no procedural outcome was reached at the meeting. Members indicated an intention to revisit the issue in a future session and requested additional follow-up materials where appropriate.
Because the committee did not adopt a filing motion or a tabling action, the audit remains officially unfiled and subject to future committee scheduling.
