Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Batesburg-Leesville council approves mutual-aid pact with Lexington County, amends SRO contract through 2027

Batesburg-Leesville Town Council · July 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Batesburg-Leesville Town Council unanimously approved a mutual-aid agreement with the Lexington County Sheriff's Office and amended a school resource officer (SRO) contract—changing a termination date to June 30, 2027—after clarifying funding splits and vehicle/equipment ownership.

The Batesburg-Leesville Town Council voted at its July meeting to approve a mutual-aid agreement with the Lexington County Sheriff's Office and to adopt a school resource officer (SRO) contract amended to extend the term through June 30, 2027.

On the mutual-aid pact, the council moved, seconded and approved the agreement between the Batesburg-Leesville Police Department and the Lexington County Sheriff's Office with a roll-call vote. “That carries,” the mayor said after the vote.

Council then reviewed the SRO contract with Lexington County School District 3 and discovered the printed contract included an outdated termination date. Councilor 12 moved to amend the adoption to change the term-of-service date from 06/30/2023 to 06/30/2027. “I'll amend my motion to adopt with the understanding that the date under number 2, term of service, will be changed from 06/30/2023 to 06/30/2027,” the councilor said. The amendment was seconded and passed.

Town staff and the police chief clarified funding and equipment arrangements. Planning/staff said the recurring terms for these positions follow prior practice: two SROs are 100% state-funded, while two positions under the agreement carry a split—75% of salaries and vehicle costs from the school district and 25% from the town. As staff explained, “The terms are the same, 75%, 25%. They will pay 75% of the salary and and vehicle,” and the council discussed ownership clauses for equipment and replacement practices.

Police leadership answered questions about vehicle replacements and body armor procurement: “We typically get a vehicle, I believe, every other year through the state,” the chief said; the chief noted grants also fund body armor replacement and other SRO equipment. Council members asked for clarification of long-term replacement costs and requested the town obtain written confirmation of the equipment-ownership and replacement schedule for future reference.

After discussion and amendment, the council voted to approve the SRO contract as amended. The votes on both the mutual-aid agreement and the amended SRO contract were recorded by roll-call; the mayor cast the final affirmative vote on each motion.

Council asked staff to supply clarified contract language and to provide follow-up information on equipment ownership and long-term funding responsibilities before the next scheduled meeting.