Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pud 1229 14th topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concept review: developer proposes 10 modest homes on former industrial parcels at 1229 14th Street
Summary
An applicant proposed rezoning two light-industrial parcels near downtown to a planned development to build 10 modest 1,000-sq-ft homes aimed at affordable ownership; staff flagged drainage, parking, setback and density flexibilities that will require detailed plans if the project advances.
Get email alerts on the Pud 1229 14th topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
An applicant presenting a concept plan for 1229 14th Street described a proposal to rezone two former light-industrial parcels to a planned development (PUD) to deliver 10 modest homes as infill near downtown Monroe.
Applicant Ben Voss described the plan as 10 three-bedroom, one-bath homes of roughly 1,000 square feet intended to provide additional homeownership opportunities near downtown, with a condo-association structure to manage common elements and covenants to restrict RVs and trailers. "The information that's been provided shows 10 modest homes ... 3 bedrooms, 1 bath, and about 1000 square feet," the applicant said.
Planner Sonia gave a detailed staff analysis and cautioned that the site presents constraints: an existing drainage channel limits developable area at the south end, and several technical items remain unresolved, including parking stall dimensions, drive aisle widths, drainage/stormwater design, building materials, and condo plat details. She explained that the applicant proposes flexibilities under a PUD compared to the SR7 base standard (which would require minimum lot sizes of about 5,000 square feet) and noted the proposal's density (about 10 dwelling units per acre) exceeds the typical maximum of 7 du/acre. Sonia also said the application lists a target price point of about $200,000 per home in the materials but observed that price would be challenging to attain under typical ownership models.
Commissioners asked detailed questions about parking allocation, ownership form, and setbacks and generally expressed support for pursuing an affordable-ownership infill project while urging the applicant and staff to resolve parking, setback, and technical site issues in subsequent formal plans. The commission took the item as a concept review and requested further materials if the applicant moves toward a general development plan.
