Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment Allegation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident alleges decades of coordinated misconduct by officials during public comment

Black Hawk County Board of Supervisors · July 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Aaron Stacy Roberts told the Black Hawk County Board that he has experienced ‘coordinated rights violations’ and named local officials he says were involved; he said he has pending litigation and asked the board to investigate. No formal board action was taken during the meeting.

During the public-comment period at the July 14 meeting, Aaron Stacy Roberts of 411 Almond Street addressed the Board of Supervisors with a lengthy account alleging persistent misconduct by local officials and law-enforcement personnel.

Roberts said he has not received “liberty and justice for all” for more than two decades and urged the board to intervene. He described what he called an ongoing criminal organization and named several people whom he said were involved, including “Charles Tedesco,” “Jody Veil,” “Hesse” and “Myers.” He said he has filed briefs in appellate proceedings and is pursuing federal litigation and a Supreme Court appeal related to a farmland dispute.

“If they read a report of someone doing something criminal, it should be investigated and looked into,” Roberts told the board, arguing that county officials—including the county attorney—have an ethical obligation to expose corruption. He said past attempts to raise concerns led to retaliatory mental-health actions against him in 2013 and that he fears further retaliation.

Board members did not take formal action in response to the comments during the meeting. The chair thanked Roberts for speaking; no county official provided a substantive response on the record and no motion to refer the matter to county staff or legal counsel was recorded in the transcript.

What’s next: Roberts requested investigation; the transcript records the allegation but does not show any board referral, follow-up assignment or response. Any official review, referral to the county attorney or law-enforcement inquiry would need to be requested and recorded in a subsequent agenda or meeting.