Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Auditor gives Lake Elmo a clean opinion, flags segregation‑of‑duties oversight

Lake Elmo City Council · July 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

External auditors presented an unmodified opinion on Lake Elmo’s 2025 comprehensive financial report, noting a significant year‑end increase in fund balance driven by revenues and developer contributions and recommending attention to segregation of duties in accounting controls.

Ryan Schmidt, partner with Schleiner Winter & Company, presented the city’s 2025 comprehensive financial report and told council the audit yielded an unmodified opinion — the highest level of assurance. "The opinion we've given this year is what's called an unmodified opinion, which is the best you can achieve," he said.

Schmidt summarized key figures: revenues exceeded budget by about $2,282,000 and expenditures were under budget by roughly $97,000, producing an actual general‑fund increase of nearly $2.3 million versus a budgeted increase of roughly $35,000. Schmidt said part of year‑over‑year increases in noncash position stem from developer‑contributed infrastructure being recognized as revenue when turned over to the city.

On internal controls, Schmidt said the audit found no significant audit adjustments or legal compliance issues but recommended attention to segregation of duties in some accounting functions (for example bank reconciliations and high‑access system privileges). "Most of the accounting functions in the city…there is good segregation of duties. But there's just a few areas…where there's just people who have kind of complete access," he said.

Council members asked follow‑up questions about the composition of nonoperating revenues, restricted net position on utility funds and how developer contributions are treated; auditors and staff explained connection fees are cash receipts while developer asset contributions are noncash infrastructure recognized as revenue and that committed/restricted balances may not appear if funds have been spent or reclassified.

Schmidt and staff offered to follow up with more detail on restricted versus committed balances if council wanted further review.