Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Traffic Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Effingham Select Board hears public concerns over proposed "local traffic only" policy for several town roads
Summary
At a public hearing, the Effingham Select Board outlined a proposal to designate several roads for "local traffic only," citing cut-through traffic and safety concerns; residents raised worries about deliveries, signage and enforcement, while police outlined a 30‑day warning and permit system based on transfer‑station stickers.
The Effingham Select Board on April 16, 2026, held a public hearing on a proposed "local traffic only" policy that would designate Green Mountain Road, Pine River Road, Elm Street and Bridal Road as restricted to vehicles with a local destination.
Committee member (speaker 2), who presented the proposal, said the policy aims to "mitigate traffic and congestion and enhance public safety" on roads that have seen a marked increase in non‑local traffic and to remove those roads from routing services used by motorists. He said the town plans to use existing transfer‑station windshield stickers as a voluntary, nontransferable permit and that purchased signage and a 30‑day warning period would precede active enforcement.
Police Chief (speaker 5) told the meeting that enforcement has legal limits: officers cannot stop motorists solely to ask their destination, and any contact must be for a legitimate motor‑vehicle reason (speeding, equipment violations, accidents). The chief outlined a suggested fine schedule — first offense in a range of roughly $50–$200 and larger penalties for repeat offenses — and said citation revenue would be deposited in the town's public safety revolving fund for equipment and cruisers.
Residents described why the regulation matters to them. "Sometimes I can't get out of my driveway for 20 minutes," a resident said, citing heavy weekend volumes and safety concerns on Elm Street and Pine River Road. Another commenter pointed to pet deaths and high speeds on Green Mountain Road. The town presented counts from a radar/counter sign: 4,815 vehicle passages one way on Green Mountain Road between May 24 and May 29, 2024; an average speed of about 32.9 mph; and top recorded speeds between 66 and 75 mph.
Not all speakers supported the measure. Elena Piedt (speaker 3) said she was generally not supportive and worried that removing roads from mapping services could make it harder for deliveries, first‑time visitors and small businesses to find destinations. She also urged the board to ensure any signage complies with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
Board members and multiple residents discussed the degree to which passenger cars versus heavy vehicles cause pavement damage; several participants said garbage trucks and heavy commercial vehicles impose the most wear, while others emphasized that increased passenger‑car volume and speed create safety problems. Speakers noted that the board vetted the approach with the New Hampshire Municipal Association and that the practical deterrent the town expects is removal of the roads as routing options from mapping services (Google, Apple Maps, Waze) once a local designation is submitted.
The board emphasized education and monitoring: transfer‑station stickers would serve as the permit, signage is already ordered, and the town will use existing speed‑count hardware to measure any changes. Committee member (speaker 2) said the board will review the policy’s effectiveness after the first tourist season and may amend or repeal it based on results. The Select Board closed the hearing and said it will consider the public feedback before any formal adoption steps.
What's next: the board plans a 30‑day public education period after implementation, continued data collection using speed/count devices, and a review of the ordinance's effectiveness after the upcoming tourist season. The record shows no final adoption vote at this meeting.
