Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves enclosure of Isabelle Rupert House carport with conditions on door and hardware

Clackamas County Historic Review Board · July 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Historic Review Board approved application Z0195 to enclose a carport at the Isabelle Rupert House, requiring the applicant to file final door designs and historic-hardware examples for the project record before construction proceeds.

The Clackamas County Historic Review Board approved enclosure of the carport at the Isabelle Rupert House on a motion that included conditions for design documentation and historic-hardware examples.

Applicant Nathan described plans to remove nonhistoric concrete siding, mill replacement Dutch lap siding and install a custom wooden barn-style garage door intended to match the original house. Nathan told the board, "We're gonna mill it ourselves...and then replace that to match the original house," and said the door will be custom-built to accommodate the home's existing slant and historic character.

A neighbor comment filed in support and board discussion focused on the lack of detailed door drawings in the application. Board members asked that the final door design and any hardware intended to replicate historic examples be submitted to the project file; the applicant agreed to provide images and research supporting the hardware choices.

After discussion, Pam moved to approve case number Z0195-26 with the conditions discussed at the meeting, and James seconded the motion. The chair called for a vote and announced a majority in favor. Staff will add the applicant's scanned images and hardware photos to the file and confirm that proposed changes match the design presented at the meeting.

The board said it preferred to allow the documentation to be part of the project record rather than require an additional appearance, provided any substantial changes are returned for review.