Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Provisional Teachers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter asks the board whether provisional teachers have improvement plans
Summary
Constance Lassiter told the Tacoma School Board she found incomplete evaluation documentation for a new teacher, described scheduling conflicts that affected students’ class access, and asked whether the district has improvement plans for provisional staff and how community members can help. The board did not respond during the meeting; the superintendent or designee will follow up.
During the public-comment period at the Tacoma School Board meeting, Constance Lassiter identified herself and raised concerns about the district’s approach to provisional teachers and mentoring.
Lassiter, who said she had worked 19 years in the district as a principal, described a mentee whose teaching performance she considered unsatisfactory and said she could find only one evaluator’s summary with no follow-up notes. She said she has copies of emails documenting scheduling conflicts that she said kept students from getting to class on time between the Learning Resource Center and regular classrooms from October through May. “Do you have an improvement plan for provisional staff?” Lassiter asked, and she offered to help if the district would accept assistance.
Board policy 1430 (public comment), cited during the meeting, directs that board members will not respond during the meeting and that the superintendent or designee will follow up if action is needed. The meeting record shows no substantive on-the-record response to the specifics Lassiter raised; the district indicated follow-up would occur outside the meeting.
Lassiter’s remarks raised two concrete questions for district staff to address: whether the district maintains improvement plans specifically for provisional teachers, and whether the scheduling conflicts she described affected student instructional time or reflected operational practices that need correction. The public record from this meeting does not resolve those questions; district staff would need to provide documentary confirmation (improvement-plan policy and any related evaluation summaries) or a written response to clarify next steps.
