Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Beach Msbu topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Flagler County panel pauses proposed beach MSBU after public concern; agrees to $0 assessment for coming year
Summary
After a technical presentation on a proposed special assessment (MSBU) to fund beach maintenance, commissioners heard extensive public comment questioning the methodology and fairness, and reached consensus to set the assessment at $0 for the upcoming tax year while funding maintenance from existing county sources and continuing study.
Chair opened the workshop item on a proposed unincorporated barrier‑island MSBU after staff outlined the project history, schedule and legal steps required to set a maximum assessment and mail owner notices.
Taylor Engineering explained the MSBU methodology, saying parcels were grouped into two tiers — ocean‑facing (tier 1) and inland (tier 2) — and that maintenance costs were modeled using an annual baseline of $50,000 per mile. The firm described an approach using equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) for residential parcels and a just‑value method for commercial and government properties, and said a 70/30 allocation of the maintenance budget between oceanfront and inland properties reflected their scoring of relative benefit, not mathematical precision.
Commissioners pressed staff and the consultant on several technical and policy points: whether the county’s 2023 beach management plan is up to date, whether reaches 3 and 4 are permittable for renourishment, how the 70/30 split was defended, and whether the MSBU could be limited to maintenance rather than construction. Staff repeatedly emphasized the current proposal would be used for maintenance and permit‑required monitoring, and that any construction funding would require a separate, project‑specific resolution.
Public comment lasted the allotted 30 minutes and featured multiple beachfront and island residents who argued the MSBU as drafted unfairly concentrated costs on a small set of unincorporated barrier‑island property owners. Speakers proposed alternatives such as a half‑cent county sales tax or broader tourism (TDT) funding, asked for clearer documentation of the apportionment study and the county’s assumed maintenance numbers, and urged more time to review the analysis.
After extended discussion and questions about timing — including uncertainty over potential statewide tax reform in November — commissioners expressed concern that mailing notices and moving to assessment rolls now would not reflect public input or additional analysis. The chair stated the board’s consensus: set the MSBU assessment amount at $0 for the upcoming tax year and fund immediate maintenance through the general fund (or other existing county sources) while staff provides additional documentation and the board revisits the issue in the next budget cycle.
The board did not adopt an assessment ordinance or a final resolution at the workshop; staff said setting a maximum assessment and notices remains an option later in the summer if the board directs. The county also plans to include the matter on upcoming public hearings so the public can see itemized proposed special benefits and allocations before any change in assessment is implemented.
