Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Signs Tmobile topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public hearing held on T‑Mobile retail plans at Hanley Station; board defers second reading
Summary
Brentwood aldermen heard a public hearing and first reading for a conditional use permit and a sign-plan amendment for a proposed T‑Mobile retail store at Hanley Station; planning staff and the planning-and-zoning commission recommended allowing three illuminated signs but removing a west-facing sign adjacent to condos. The board did not complete a second reading tonight.
The Brentwood Board of Aldermen opened a public hearing and later conducted a first reading of an ordinance authorizing a conditional use permit and site development plan for a proposed T‑Mobile retail store at 1201 Strassner Drive within the Hanley Station urban-development district.
Whitney Kelly, speaking on behalf of the city of Brentwood, told the board the applicant proposes exterior changes that include removing an outdoor patio and a brick wall to increase storefront visibility and allow window signage. Steve Behrens of Warren Sign Company, the installer, said the applicants requested three illuminated signs; an initially proposed fourth sign on the west elevation was dropped to reduce impact on adjacent condo residents. “We’re the installing company for the sign package,” Behrens said.
Planning staff said the planning-and-zoning commission had recommended removing the west-facing sign because it faces a residential condominium development while allowing three signs on the other elevations and limiting window-sign size. Board members raised questions about customer parking and hours of operation; Whitney Kelly said the overall Hanley Station development includes significant parking in a parking structure and that applicants proposed four designated customer spaces, with two located near the site entrance and two in front of the building.
Several aldermen pressed how reserved parking would be enforced and whether condo owners had been consulted; staff said enforcement would be the property owner’s responsibility but that the city could work with the applicant to specify reserved hours that align with business operation. The mayor declined to take a second reading tonight after the public hearing, saying the board would likely take a second reading at the next meeting.
The public offered no testimony during the hearing. No vote occurred on the conditional use permit or the sign‑plan amendment at this meeting; both items remain pending further board action.
