Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conservation Advisory Council urges full environmental review for Niskayuna Harbor PUD
Summary
The Conservation Advisory Council presented the CAC’s recommendation that the Niskayuna Harbor sketch plan (approx. 41 acres) warrant a positive declaration under SEQRA, citing wetlands, a high water table, stormwater concerns, and potential impacts to the historic 1817 canal.
A presenter for the Conservation Advisory Council summarized the CAC’s review of the proposed Niskayuna Harbor Planned Unit Development and recommended the committee support a positive declaration under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) so the project undergo a full environmental impact statement (EIS).
The CAC presenter said the roughly 41-acre site includes jurisdictional wetlands regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, non-jurisdictional wetlands, and a very high water table ("between 8 inches and 18 inches" on parts of the site). The presenter described engineering and hydrology concerns: the sketch plan concentrates stormwater near wetlands and proposes filling soils to support building pads, which could redirect contaminants — pesticides, road salt and other runoff — into the canal and wetlands and raise the risk of degradation and algal blooms.
"This is a type 1 action...the CAC either has to decide whether it has a positive environmental impact or a negative environmental impact," the presenter said, explaining that a positive declaration would require scoping an EIS to study alternatives and mitigation.
Committee members agreed the site’s wetlands and the historic canal make this parcel especially complex. Members noted prior projects in the town that advanced through SEQRA and that county, DOT and DEC had indicated willingness to review the materials as involved agencies. The committee discussed sequencing: a positive declaration and EIS scoping would precede final PUD action and allow the developer to analyze alternatives such as moving building footprints or changing stormwater design.
The committee did not vote at this meeting; staff and the CAC plan to finalize the CAC findings and present a resolution recommending a positive declaration at a future meeting.
