Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oxford reviews Strand stormwater fix; residents warn trees, ADA access and truck turns could be affected
Summary
At a special Town of Oxford workshop, engineers presented a plan to curb and channel runoff along the Strand roadway, funded in part by a possible $300,000 MDE grant; residents pressed for protections for mature trees, clarified maintenance and raised ADA and truck-turning concerns. Commissioners asked staff to finalize scope and issue an RFP for contractor bids.
Oxford held a public workshop to review a proposed stormwater project on the Strand roadway that town staff and engineers said is intended to eliminate standing water and meet state water-quality requirements. The plan calls for roughly 1,400 feet of curb and channel drains, a submerged gravel wetland with an underdrain and a check valve to reduce tidal inundation; funding is dependent on a potential $300,000 Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) grant, staff said.
The plan was presented by the project's technical lead (identified in the meeting as Glenn), who explained the narrow elevation range available along the Strand and the need for precise grading. "Inches matter here. Quarter inches matter here," Glenn said while showing topographic exhibits and a turning-radius demonstration for large delivery vehicles. He described channel drains (concrete troughs with grates) that would route the water to a four-bay sediment forebay and then through a submerged gravel wetland designed to meet the state's stormwater manual.
Why this matters: the roadway currently ponds water in the curve by the marina and in the adjacent parking area, causing rutting of a 4-foot grassy strip previously installed as part of phase 1. Town staff said improvements are restricted to town-owned property and the town right-of-way, which limits where mitigation devices and curb placements can be built.
Residents focused on three practical trade-offs. Condo and property owners warned the deeper submerged gravel wetland and associated grading could damage mature willow oak root systems. One resident told the panel, "The construction is intended to kill our trees," a claim the engineer rejected as intentional: "That is not intended by us, Roger," the presenter responded and said the team would obtain an arborist assessment and attempt to adjust locations where feasible.
A second concern was ADA access: the project preserves a 4-foot grassy strip intended for a future sidewalk, but telephone poles and right-of-way limits make a future accessible path challenging. Staff emphasized that the current phase is limited to drainage fixes; preserving space for a future ADA-compliant sidewalk is part of the approach but building the sidewalk was not included in phase 1.
Third, commercial operators and residents pressed the town to ensure trucks can still turn into and out of the marina and parking area without damaging curbing or the grassy strip. The engineers showed a WB-58 turning-radius exhibit and proposed local pavement stabilization behind the curb (concrete pads, riprap or reinforced stone) so trucks can traverse the curb without repeated damage.
On maintenance and operation, the presenter recommended periodic inspection and cleaning of channel drains and the forebay—generally on about a six-month rotation—and acknowledged that sediment traps will require an ongoing maintenance schedule to function as intended.
Funding, permitting and timing: staff said the project team is working with MDE on potential grant funding of approximately $300,000; if the grant is not awarded the town would rely on stormwater, shoreline protection or capital-improvement funds from the enterprise budget. Finalizing the scope for the state review and releasing an RFP were identified as the immediate next steps; staff estimated a bidding period of roughly 45 days, contract award by the commissioners and three to four months of construction once a contractor is selected, with possible construction in the fall.
What the town directed: after discussion the group agreed on direction for staff to finalize the scope of work, incorporate the public feedback where feasible (including moving the bioswale slightly and reducing forebay depth where possible), submit the scope for state review and post an RFP for contractor bids. There was no formal vote on the project tonight; the meeting adjourned following a motion to end the workshop.
Next step: staff will bring a finalized plan and the RFP posting to a commissioners' meeting for formal consideration and funding decisions.
