Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Union City holds short public hearing on proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1118

Borough of Union City · September 16, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Borough of Union City held a brief public hearing Sept. 16, 2024, on a proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1118 to define and regulate redemption (games of skill) and to allow accessory structures on adjoining lots. No members of the public spoke; the hearing was adjourned.

Union City Borough held a public hearing on Sept. 16, 2024, to receive comment on a proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1118 that would define and regulate "redemption games" (also described as games of skill) and add a provision allowing accessory structures on adjoining lots, the borough record shows.

The hearing, called to order at 6:05 p.m. by Councilor Cross at First Global Methodist Church, listed Councilors Cross, Osborn, Steadman and Kerns as present and Solicitor Tim Wachter and Constituent Services Representative Kim Tuszynski among officials in attendance. The stated purpose was to provide information and receive public comment on three elements: definitions and regulation of permitted use zones for redemption games, adding Section 701.04 to address accessory structures on adjoining lots, and inserting repealer, severability and an effective date into the ordinance.

The record states that no visitors attended to provide public comment during the hearing. With no public comments recorded, Councilor Steadman moved that the hearing be adjourned; Councilor Osborn seconded the motion. The hearing adjourned at 6:09 p.m., and no vote or formal action on adoption of the ordinance amendment is recorded in this hearing's minutes.

The minutes do not record further debate, amendments to Ordinance No. 1118, or a scheduled date for a council vote. Next procedural steps, if any, are not specified in the hearing record.

Attendees listed in the record included Solicitor Tim Wachter and Constituent Services Representative Kim Tuszynski. The record lists Councilors Joyce, Winkler and Uber as absent.