Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Andover board approves payroll and most vendor payments, delays Eastern Salt payout
Summary
The Andover Select Board on June 9 approved wage warrants and most items on Financial Warrant #50, including a $107,741 payment to the Andover School Department, but discussion left an Eastern Salt Company payment on hold; the board later approved the remainder of the warrant totaling $138,930.32.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Andover Select Board approved payroll and a slate of vendor payments during its June 9 meeting, voting to pay Wage Warrant #50 for $9,946.56 and to adjust Wage Warrant #49 to $6,192.11. The board also approved a $107,741.00 payment to the Andover School Department as part of Financial Warrant #50.
"Motion to pay Andover School Department $107,741.00" carried after discussion, Chair Brian Mills said. The board approved other vendors including Archies, Inc. ($1,857.29), Darley ($1,187.24) and multiple MedCare invoices, though the transcript shows one Eastern Salt Company payment was discussed and did not pass at that time.
Board members flagged budget-scenario questions tied to the warrants should a budget not pass later; Mills and Justin Thacker, who seconded multiple motions, discussed contingency implications. The board ultimately voted to pay the remainder of Financial Warrant #50, bringing the day's approved total listed in the motion to $138,930.32.
The motions were routinely made by Chair Brian Mills and seconded by Justin Thacker; votes were recorded in the minutes as "Carried." The transcript does not provide roll-call vote tallies for most motions, and the minutes do not list individual yes/no votes for each vendor. The board also approved the formal meeting minutes for May 26 and June 2, 2026.
Next procedural steps: the minutes note outstanding discussions and that the Eastern Salt payment will be revisited; no specific date for that follow-up was recorded in the meeting text.
