Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development And Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Fairfield council on Whispering Hill and Pleasant & John Gray developments, citing traffic and TIF concerns
Summary
Residents urged council to use tools such as TIFs and developer conditions to address traffic and density at two residential projects; staff said engineering drawings for Whispering Hill just arrived and that John Gray & Pleasant remains subject to prior zoning conditions. The discussion flagged a developer commitment of about $700,000 for a left-turn lane and the prior $1.2 million forgivable loan at Whispering Hill.
During the citizen-comment period resident Scott Lipsky (S15) asked for updates on two residential projects—Whispering Hill and the Pleasant & John Gray development—and pressed council to address traffic and density impacts raised during public outreach.
Lipsky said public outreach had shown a demand for patio homes and townhomes but that intersections serving those projects are already problematic. He noted that, 'As it stands, what council passed, the developer's current commitment is approximately $700,000 to extend a left turn Lane,' and contrasted that cost with a previously approved $1,200,000 forgivable loan and a 30-year TIF for another project.
Development staff (S16) told council they had just received engineer drawings from Baerbecker Engineering for Whispering Hill 'at the end of last week' and that staff are reviewing them. The next procedural step is a Planning Commission recommendation on the final PUD, after which the item would return to council. On John Gray & Pleasant, staff said zoning approvals remain in place and any significant alteration would return to the approval process.
Council members asked whether developer conditions cover intersection extensions. Staff said the approval included requirements for certain turn-lane work and public improvements tied to the project, but added that broader intersection widening beyond those conditions is not guaranteed without further negotiation or a new approval process. Council discussed tools such as creating a TIF district to provide a dedicated revenue stream for intersection improvements if council decides to pursue that option.
Council members and Lipsky agreed the intersection merits study regardless of whether development proceeds immediately; one council member said they were unwilling to open a TIF for housing enhancements unless it was specifically focused on the intersection improvements.
The exchange closed with staff committing to continue reviewing submitted engineering materials and to provide updates once Planning Commission makes a recommendation.
