Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Performance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews midyear academic progress, AGR spending and staff-retention plans
Summary
District administrators and three elementary principals reported midyear progress on board goals, including STAR/AIMSweb growth metrics and Achievement Gap Reduction (AGR) funding uses; board members pressed for additional retention-analysis documentation and questioned ACT/proficiency interpretation.
District administration and elementary principals presented a midyear review of the board's goals at the Feb. 24 Northland Pines School District board meeting, focusing on student growth metrics, Achievement Gap Reduction (AGR) use and emerging staff-retention strategies.
District administrator S7 told the board the district is tracking multiple measures of student growth. “Almost 88 percent of our students did show growth,” S7 said when summarizing STAR reading outcomes, while noting some proficiency percentages varied by grade. S7 and principals described consideration of STAR and AIMSweb data to drive individualized reading plans, and noted that 1:1 tutoring and instructional coaching are primary AGR-eligible uses where class-size constraints prevent using AGR for reduced ratios.
The three elementary principals (S15, S13 and S3) presented AGR-required midyear spreadsheets for Saint Germain, Land O'Lakes and Eberville elementary schools. They said most classrooms showed fall-to-winter growth in math and literacy but flagged that several 2nd- and 3rd-grade cohorts are not yet at target proficiency and will need tiered interventions.
Board member S12 sought clarification on an employee-retention analysis he had requested at a prior meeting; S7 said the district has a document and will bring it forward next month. Trustees also questioned how ACT and preACT-secure scores relate to local proficiency rates, and administrators explained that the ACT is a one-day college-preparation assessment and that some juniors (especially non-college-bound students) may not engage, which affects percentages for that particular measure.
Administrators stressed that test scores represent one piece of a broader strategy that includes attendance, family engagement and targeted classroom instruction. They said the district will continue to refine data reporting and will provide the requested retention analysis and additional comparative baseline numbers at a future meeting.
Next steps: staff will provide the employee-retention document and additional historical baseline testing comparisons at upcoming board work; principals will continue implementation of individualized reading plans and AGR-funded tutoring.
