Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Residency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident asks Oconto council to investigate whether member meets city residency rules
Summary
During public comment a resident alleged a councilmember does not live at the claimed city address and asked the council to consider enforcement under local ordinances 2‑3‑68 and 2‑3‑17 §8; the council did not take immediate enforcement action on the record.
A member of the public asked the Oconto City Council to investigate whether councilmember Laurie Stentstra meets the city's residency requirements, citing Ordinance 2‑3‑68 and a removal power in Ordinance 2‑3‑17 §8.
The commenter said they reviewed public records and payroll forms and asserted the councilmember’s primary residence is outside the city, and asked the council to place the matter on a future agenda so the council could determine whether to remove the member from office. The comment included a request that the council explain whether local ordinances or a state statute govern eligibility in this specific case.
Council members did not record a formal response or take action on the record during the meeting. A council member acknowledged the concern and said the council should follow established rules and evaluate what is appropriate under local and state law. The commenter’s request to put the item on a future agenda was explicitly stated but no scheduling action was recorded in the transcript.
Next steps to resolve this claim would require the council or staff to review residency documentation and applicable law; the transcript does not include any staff or council finding on the matter.
