Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter urges 'second chance' approach after volunteer‑coach application denied
Summary
At the July 22 meeting a public commenter identified as Mr. Branch said his application to be a volunteer trainer was denied because of items on his record, described decades of coaching and military service, and asked the board for clarification of volunteer selection and any second‑chance policy.
During the public‑comment portion of the July 22 meeting Mr. Branch told the Elizabeth City‑Pasquotank Board of Education he had been denied as a volunteer trainer and asked how volunteer coaches are selected and what remedies exist for applicants with past records.
Mr. Branch said he had served more than 36 years in the military and more than 30 years as a coach, and that he had volunteered widely in the county before the pandemic. He said his volunteer application was denied and asked the board for clarification and a second‑chance consideration: “My application for volunteer trainer was denied,” he told the board.
Chair Angela Cobb thanked Mr. Branch for his comments; the board made no public action or policy change in response during the meeting. The transcript records Mr. Branch’s request for clarification but does not show board members committing to a follow‑up review of volunteer‑screening policy.
Why it matters
Volunteer coaches support school athletics and extracurriculars; questions about eligibility and background‑check standards affect community members who seek to contribute time and skills to students. Mr. Branch’s remarks raise a procedural question the board or administration may choose to address in a future meeting.
What to watch for
If the board directs staff to review volunteer screening or adopt a formal second‑chance policy, that action would be recorded in future meeting minutes; no such direction appears in the July 22 open‑session record.
