Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sports Facility Proposal topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City hears proposal for large indoor sports complex on RDA land; council suggests feasibility study

West Valley City Council · July 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented an exploratory proposal for a 100,000–140,000 sq ft indoor sports facility on RDA-owned property to host tournaments year-round; consultants and Sports Salt Lake argued the facility could generate significant economic activity and the council asked for a feasibility study to examine costs, land needs and access for residents.

Harold Malini (CMO staff) told the council staff were presenting an alternative option for RDA-owned property near the Utah Cultural Celebration Center: a dedicated indoor sports facility intended to reduce travel for local athletes and attract regional tournaments.

Clay Partain (Sports Salt Lake) said sports tourism is a major industry and presented comparables and national figures, citing an industry report that placed sports-tourism economic activity in the hundreds of billions nationally. He described venue comparables that ranged from $15–$30 million development costs and 130,000–145,000 square feet of dedicated space, and he argued a facility with roughly 12–15 basketball courts (100,000–140,000 sq ft) could host regional and national events and operate year-round.

Council members asked practical questions about acreage needs, the mix of sports (basketball, volleyball, wrestling, soccer, and constraints around baseball/softball because of land needs), revenue-sharing under public-private partnership (P3) models, the balance of tournament versus resident access, and how local athletes would be prioritized for access during heavy tournament schedules. Several members suggested a formal feasibility study to address economics, operations, and land-use constraints.

Malini and Partain emphasized they were not asking the council to decide now, only whether the council was interested in pursuing discussions with potential partners and a feasibility study.

Next steps: staff recommended meeting with potential partners and a feasibility study to return financial and operational options to the council for further consideration.