Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Revenue Clause topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
El Paso negotiators clash over clause to protect city revenue from state limits
Summary
City officials proposed contract language that would allow future adjustments subject to city council approval if state action limits property-tax revenue; Local 51 rejected the clause 'as currently written' but signaled willingness to discuss clarifications.
El Paso City negotiators presented proposed contract language intended to protect the city if state law further limits its authority to raise property taxes or other fees, prompting a clear objection from Local 51 at the July 14 bargaining session.
Robert Cortinez, speaking for the city, said the clause is meant to shield municipal finances from recent and possible future state actions that could "limit or restrict city's ability to generate property tax revenue." He framed the language as a protective mechanism that would return any recommended adjustments to the city council for approval.
Local 51 President Jay Nicholson responded that, "as it's written, it's a no from this side," while indicating the union would discuss points of clarification. The transcript records the city offering to receive feedback and to consider revisions based on the union's input.
No formal motion or vote occurred on the clause during the session; staff said they would take feedback and continue discussions at the next meeting scheduled for the following Thursday.
