Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Consent Agenda topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clackamas County commissioners approve consent agendas, authorizing contracts and grants

Clackamas County Board of Commissioners · April 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved the Board and Water Environment Services consent agendas, authorizing multiple contracts and grants (including a Justice Court cloud software purchase, an OEM grant with county match, and WES construction and engineering agreements); votes were unanimous 4–0.

At the April 30 meeting the Clackamas County Board of Commissioners approved the Board consent agenda and — while convened as the Water Environment Services (WES) board — approved the WES consent agenda. The Board then reconvened as the board of county commissioners.

Clerk Andrew Jirachi read multiple items on the Board consent agenda. Highlights included a one‑year sublease with American Property Management for justice court parking lot spaces ($1,752), a three‑year purchase order with Tyler Technologies for Justice Court cloud software ($353,970), and an Oregon Emergency Management emergency management performance grant for $302,281 that the clerk said requires a county match of $151,140.50 in budgeted general funds. Health, housing and human services items included contract and amendment listings for shelter and motel/hotel services and other personal services agreements.

During the WES consent agenda, the WES board approved a construction manager/general contractor agreement with Slating Constructors for the Tri‑City Water Resource Recovery Facility influent pump station expansion ($235,212) and a $1,000,000 on‑call engineering services contract with Stantec. Funding for the WES items was identified as water environment services sanitary sewer construction or operating funds; the clerk noted no county general fund involvement for the WES items.

Commissioner West moved to approve the Board consent agenda and Commissioner Helm seconded; the clerk polled Commissioners Savas, Helm, West and the chairing vice chair and the motion passed 4–0. Director West moved to approve the WES consent agenda and Director Helm seconded; the WES motion also passed 4–0.

The clerk’s reading included several large dollar figures and funding source notes. One item in the health and housing section was read as a total agreement value of $14,454,514.24 and — in the same sentence — a figure of $300,062,912 in budgeted county general funds was also read; that large value appears inconsistent with other items in the consent agenda and was not clarified during the meeting.