Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Herndon council reviews FY2027 follow‑ups: bulk pickup costs and the town’s 'peak' water charge
Summary
Council heard staff answers on covering an estimated $130,000 bulk‑pickup cost and on how Herndon’s 'peak' water rate is calculated and used. Staff proposed options for the solid‑waste fee and said peak‑rate revenue is significant but that policy changes require further analysis.
Herndon — At a work session on April 21, the Herndon Town Council discussed follow‑up budget details for FY2027, focusing on whether to cover an estimated $130,000 cost for contracted bulk pickup and on how the town applies a volumetric “peak” water charge.
Marjorie Stone, the town’s finance director, said the current contract for spring/fall bulk pickup has expired and the incremental cost to program a spring 2027 cleanup is about $130,000. "If we did [include that in the budget], we would be raising the solid waste fee from $21 to 35," Stone said, explaining that council could either identify offsets elsewhere in the budget or modestly increase the quarterly solid‑waste fee (the proposed fee in the packet is $30). She added that staff estimates roughly 25% resident participation in cleanup events and that the service is used predominantly by detached single‑family homes; an individual contracted pickup unit is priced at about $60.
On water billing, Stone clarified the town’s peak charge is not simply a seasonal time‑of‑use surcharge but is measured against an account’s winter quarter average: usage above that baseline is billed at a peak volumetric rate, and the town does not apply sewer charges to the excess water. Stone said the peak rate in the proposed budget is correct and estimated that peak charges account for roughly 12% of total water revenue; about 40% of accounts experience a peak charge in a typical year. Staff noted the town’s high‑read reports and a leak ordinance that provide customer protections when usage spikes are due to a leak.
Councilors raised equity concerns: several members asked whether the peak structure disproportionately targets households with summer outdoor watering, pools or other non‑sewer use and whether rising volumetric rates increase the nominal dollar value of the peak surcharge. Staff said the peak rate has historically tracked volumetric rate changes and that any structural changes to the rate would be a policy decision for council and would require additional analysis and potential rescoping with the town’s financial consultant.
Members also discussed advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) and real‑time customer data; staff said an AMI upgrade would be a major, multi‑million‑dollar capital project not currently in the near‑term CIP. Council signaled they were comfortable keeping the current peak structure for the immediate FY2027 budget but directed staff to return with additional analysis and data to inform a possible policy review.
