Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs keeping temporary barricades on Memory Lane, staff proposes weight limits after infrastructure completion
Summary
Council discussed keeping temporary barricades on Memory Lane to deter construction cut-through traffic; city staff proposed leaving barriers until city infrastructure is complete and then adding enforceable weight-restriction signage, while public-safety officials urged attention to emergency access and enforcement mechanics.
Council members on Aug. 18 debated whether temporary barricades on Memory Lane in the Dreamfields area should remain in place and for how long.
Lucas, a city staffer, told the council the motion from July 7 had kept temporary barricades until 50% of River's Edge 2nd Addition was built, but he recommended a narrower trigger: keep the temporary structures in place until the city's infrastructure work for the project (streets, water, sewer) is completed, then install weight-restriction signage on Memory Lane to deter heavy construction traffic.
"Something that we thought might be more reasonable is if the structures remained in place until the project was completed, meaning the infrastructure is in place," Lucas said. He added that Cass County deputies and the county state's attorney discussed enforcement and that enforcement would be a partnership between the city and county.
Council members sought a finite timeline and asked whether the proposal would create an open-ended restriction. Several members said an annual review or a completion-based trigger would be preferable to an indefinite restriction tied to uncertain private build-out timelines.
Public-safety speakers said temporary barricades can be moved for emergencies but warned about ambulance crews unfamiliar with local barricade locations. Sheriff Keller and a fire representative said the barriers are movable; Keller noted enforcement limitations where certified scales are required to measure weight for commercial vehicles, and advised the council to consider signage and designated no-truck routes where enforceable.
The council did not adopt a new ordinance on Aug. 18 but discussed next steps: staff will return with recommendations on a timing metric (city infrastructure completion vs. development buildout), recommended signage, and enforcement options in coordination with Cass County.
