Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pasco County approves several rezonings, conditional uses and MPUDs amid environmental and traffic concerns
Summary
At its July 7 meeting the board approved multiple land‑use items — including a rezoning for an assisted‑living community (Ravilla Ranch), the Mitchell 41 MPUD amendments, and several conditional uses — after public comment on environmental protection, traffic, and trail connectivity.
Pasco County commissioners on July 7 approved a series of land‑use items after extended presentations and public comment on environmental protection, neighborhood compatibility and transportation.
Ravilla Ranch (Rivero Ranch MPUD amendment / P87), a proposal for a boutique assisted‑living community in the Village of Pasadena Hills, was pulled from the consent agenda after objections. Objectors argued the institutional footprint was inconsistent with local master‑plan policies and would harm scenic vistas. The applicant presented one‑story, 35‑foot maximum buildings, a quarter‑acre park, and binding elevations; planning staff recommended consistency with applicable policies. After debate and an agreement to bind the conceptual site plan and architectural standards as conditions of approval, the board approved the rezoning.
The Mitchell 41 MPUD (P93), a comprehensive rezoning for approximately 1,219 acres west of US 41, was presented with commitments to preserve roughly 98% of on‑site wetlands and create tree‑preservation areas. Staff and the applicant detailed connectivity plans, multiuse trails, and right‑of‑way dedications tied to future widening of US 41. Residents objected to potential fragmentation and environmental impacts; the board approved the transmittal/rezoning with conditions.
The board also considered P89, a conditional‑use consolidation for an agritourism/amusement use on roughly 118 acres that included a request to expand alcohol sales and weekend hours. Objectors cited road safety and compatibility concerns; the applicant said extensive mitigation and neighborhood outreach had been completed. The board approved the conditional‑use application, with conditions and transportation mitigation to be addressed through required reviews.
Several consent items and other rezoning continuances were also settled during the meeting. Commissioners repeatedly asked staff for more detail on trail connectivity and safe crossings where the Orange Belt Trail and multiuse paths intersected proposed development and commercial parcels.
What happens next: approvals are subject to placard conditions, required site plans and technical reviews (traffic, wetland delineation, and construction plans) before permits are issued. Several items were continued or pulled for additional engineering checks.
