Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves 30‑unit Emerson development amid church preservation concerns
Summary
After extended public comment, the council approved major variations for a 30‑unit development at 1103–1105 Emerson that includes inclusionary housing (40% AMI units). Pastor Deborah Scott and Ebenezer AME Church members expressed doubts about enforcement of a 'good neighbor' agreement; council and staff said protections were codified in the ordinance and that stormwater and infrastructure questions were addressed.
The Evanston City Council on July 13 approved major variations permitting a 30‑unit development at 1103–1105 Emerson Street after lengthy public comment from neighbors and congregation members of Ebenezer AME Church.
Pastor Deborah Scott and church members urged the council to delay or reject the project, saying they did not have confidence the city would enforce the development’s good‑neighbor agreement or adequately protect historic features. "My church members still have concerns. They don't feel that the city... will enforce this good neighbor agreement," Pastor Scott said.
Council members and staff responded with measure details and assurances. Water bureau leadership told council that civil engineering plans are pending but that developers had acknowledged stormwater detention would be required, and that local sewer improvements completed in 2007 reduced surcharge concerns. Council member Burns said he had worked with the church and that provisions requested by the congregation were codified in the ordinance; he also said demolition and construction would be prohibited until required protections were in place.
Supporters noted the project will provide inclusionary housing: the units will be set at 40% AMI levels (staff noted a two‑bedroom at about $1,100 under that program) and help address affordable‑housing demand. Council debated design, massing and historical context; the vote to adopt the ordinance passed 5–1 with Council member Kelly dissenting on massing and neighborhood fit.
Council instructed staff to enforce the good‑neighbor provisions through permits, construction management plans and certificate‑of‑occupancy conditions before allowing demolition or occupancy.
