Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Electric Motorcycles topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears first reading of electric-motorcycle ordinance to clarify enforcement

Enumclaw City Council · June 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council received a staff report and first reading of Ordinance No. 2,839 to define and regulate high-powered electric motorcycles in city code, proposing area restrictions, equipment and operator requirements, and penalties to address safety and enforcement gaps.

The Enumclaw City Council on June 22 received the first reading of Ordinance No. 2,839, a proposed municipal code chapter that would define and restrict electric motorcycles deemed distinct from e‑bikes and mopeds.

The Police Chief delivered the staff report, saying the vehicles — including high‑powered electric dirt bikes — have appeared increasingly on streets, sidewalks and trails and that current law does not clearly classify them. "These vehicles are often marketed as recreational or off‑road use devices, but are frequently operated on public streets, sidewalks, and multi use trails within city limits," the Chief said, summarizing resident complaints about unsafe speeds, operation on sidewalks and near‑miss incidents involving pedestrians.

The ordinance would create a clear definition based on power output, speed capability and design; prohibit operation on sidewalks, parks and multi‑use trails unless expressly authorized; and require helmets, lighting and minimum safety equipment when used on roadways. It also proposes operator requirements, including a valid driver’s license for roadway operation and age restrictions where appropriate, and establishes penalties ranging from warnings to impoundment for repeat or egregious cases.

Council discussion was brief because this was a first reading; the staff report noted the city attorney reviewed the draft to reduce conflict with state statutes and that recent state legislation has prompted a Department of Licensing workgroup to develop statewide rules by October 2027. The Chief said the municipal language is intended to "complement, not conflict with, state law" and to give local enforcement clearer tools.

As a first reading, the ordinance will return for a subsequent hearing where councilmembers may propose amendments before adoption.

The council did not take a final vote on Ordinance No. 2,839 at the June 22 meeting.