Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Coalition Phase Ii topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Falcon Heights council signals support for Coalition for Safe & Stable Communities Phase II, requests more detail
Summary
Mayor Gustafson summarized a regional meeting introducing Phase II of the Coalition for Safe & Stable Communities; councilmembers asked for clearer deliverables and noted concern about scope while staff said Phase II would focus on election security and return value through federal advocacy.
Mayor Gustafson summarized a recent regional gathering of roughly two dozen cities that reviewed accomplishments from Phase I and introduced Phase II of the Coalition for Safe & Stable Communities, a regional intermunicipal coalition that would continue centralized information sharing and federal advocacy.
Linehan told the council that Phase II's total cost to participating cities is $30,000 for one year, with Minnetonka holding the contract with the consultant Momentum; the minutes estimate Falcon Heights' share as roughly $1,200 (the transcript contains a typographical error in the upper end of the recorded range). Linehan said Phase I had provided value by centralizing information during a period of federal uncertainty and that neither the League of Minnesota Cities nor Metro Cities provides the same federal advocacy function.
Councilmembers probed the coalition's likely deliverables and long‑term purpose. Councilmember Wassenberg said Phase I's listed accomplishments "had seemed focused primarily on securing state funding for cities rather than on more substantive organizational or legal efforts at the federal level" and asked for evidence of federal‑level impact. Councilmember Mogen warned the group could become a "zombie"—an organization that continues indefinitely without a clear purpose—unless Phase II had measurable results. Linehan said Phase II would place emphasis on election security and countering federal narratives about Minnesota mail‑in ballots, and the council generally agreed the one‑year commitment was modest and appropriate if staff and elected officials could evaluate results before renewing participation.
The workshop contained no formal vote on joining the coalition. Council discussion produced a direction to consider participation for one year, subject to evaluation of Phase II deliverables and staff review of the contract details before any financial commitment would be finalized.
