Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transparency And Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates whether to continue recording subcommittee meetings; referral to full board planned
Summary
Committee members questioned the value and cost of recording subcommittee meetings after staff reported low view counts; the presenter said the matter will be placed on full board agendas for discussion.
The committee spent a substantial portion of the meeting debating whether to continue recording subcommittee meetings for public posting. Presenter (S2) said committee videos attract few views and managing recording equipment requires staff time. “I just look at it and say for the amount of time, effort to continue keeping up with equipment and that we're not getting a lot of use,” S2 said.
Other members pushed back on removing recordings, emphasizing transparency and access: “It's all about transparency and access, and they have the opportunity to come sit here, lie, or ask for written,” said S3, arguing that recordings give the public multiple ways to engage.
Staff (S6) raised technical and staffing constraints: “When I have the time to be here and set it up, you know, it's fine…if there does happen to be some kind of tech issue…it's hard for Scott and Susie to know…what are the little tricks to do with it,” S6 said.
Outcome: S2 proposed and multiple members agreed to bring the recording question to the full board for review. S2 said they would put the item on three committee agendas and present it at the Monday board meeting for a broader decision.
What happens next: the committee did not vote to end recording; instead leaders will refer the issue to the full board so all members can weigh the trade‑offs between staff time and public access.
