Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Insurance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews UMR renewal and recommends splitting small deductible increase with employees
Summary
Board members discussed a recommended 3% health-insurance renewal with UMR that district staff say would keep the plan stable; staff recommended splitting the federal high-deductible-plan minimum increase so employees pay an additional $50 (single) or $100 (family) while the district covers half via an HRA.
The board reviewed a proposed renewal with UMR that district staff recommended at a 3% increase and asked for direction on cost sharing for employee deductibles. Presenter argued the district’s health plan is a major budget item — “health insurance is approaching or it will be over a $4,000,000 part of our budget,” the presenter said — and recommended staying with UMR after committee review.
The recommendation includes a 3% premium renewal from UMR and a change in employee out-of-pocket responsibility tied to federal high-deductible-plan minimums: employees would face an additional $50 for single coverage and $100 for family coverage if the federal minimum pushes costs higher; the district would absorb the other half and place its contribution into an HRA. The presenter said staff and the district’s insurance consultant advised this direction after considering market options and prior experience with Security Health.
Board members asked about specifics of how the change would affect employees and the district budget. The presenter said the staff committee and consultants had examined options, that pharmacy and utilization trends are driving costs, and that the recommendation seeks to balance budget certainty with benefit quality. The presenter also said the district intends to continue paying the HSA/HRA contribution at present levels and to study longer-term alternatives to contain costs.
A motion to pursue the recommended renewal was made and seconded during the meeting, but the transcript does not record a final roll-call vote on the renewal in this excerpt. The recommendation was described as coming out of the personnel and finance committees and staff indicated they will provide additional information to the full board before any final contractual commitment.
