Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County pauses voting-machine contract amid dispute over CDL requirement
Summary
A local moving company challenged the award of bid 34-26 for election voting-machine transport, saying the solicitation required CDL-qualified drivers; staff said the wording leaves ambiguity ('CDL if required by DOT') and the commission voted to reject the low bid and reissue a clarified solicitation to ensure fairness before the Aug. 11 election.
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Paul Pritchard, owner of Tide Moving and Storage, told the commission his bid complied with every requirement for bid invitation 34-26 but that the apparent low bidder’s submission suggests drivers without commercial driver's licenses may be used. Pritchard urged the county to verify that the successful bidder meets mandatory specifications before the contract is awarded.
"The issue is that the bid specifications require CDL drivers," Pritchard said, urging the commission to pause the award and confirm compliance so all bidders compete under the same rules.
County staff and commissioners reviewed the solicitation language. Jay (staff) read the clause aloud: "Drivers must possess a commercial driver's license as required by DOT," and explained that DOT rules tie the requirement to vehicle size and weight. Staff reported the low bidder proposed vehicles that DOT does not deem to require a CDL, creating a possible compliance 'gray area.'
Commissioners debated timing: the municipal election is Aug. 11 and the first delivery would be Aug. 6, but commissioners expressed concern that ambiguous bid language could be unfair to bidders who incurred costs to meet what they believed were mandatory requirements. The board ultimately moved to reject bid number 34-26 and direct staff to reissue opportunities for quotes with clarified instructions so the county can proceed in time for elections.
What happens next: the commission adopted a motion to reject the contested bid and directed staff to rewrite or clarify the solicitation and pursue quotes or a re-bid; commissioners noted they may call a special meeting if timing requires it before the Aug. 11 election.

