Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner withdraws proposed lobbying-contract oversight resolution after mayor amends lobbyist contract to add reporting
Summary
A resolution to require annual commission approval of county lobbying contracts was withdrawn after the mayor negotiated an addendum requiring the county lobbyist to provide pre- and post-legislative session reports; commissioners debated possible unintended consequences for department-level lobbyists.
Get email alerts on the Government Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner Bill Petty introduced a resolution asking the commission to require annual review and approval of county lobbying services contracts and to require regular reporting from lobbyists. During debate commissioners raised concerns about unintended consequences for lobbyists retained by elected officials or departments (for example, sheriff or assessor arrangements) and whether the resolution would overreach into those contracts.
Mayor Rogers Anderson reported the administration had revised the county''s lobbyist contract to include pre- and post-legislative session reporting at no additional cost and said the lobbyist agreed to the addendum. Commissioner Petty said the contracted addendum addresses his primary concerns about transparency and accountability and withdrew his resolution. The motion to withdraw was accepted and the resolution was removed from consideration.
Commissioners highlighted the value of improved reporting and transparency but cautioned about drafting language that could unintentionally cover contracts held by other elected officials or departmental associations. The mayor and commissioners agreed reporting provisions in the amended contract represented a near-term solution; the body may revisit a narrower policy if needed later.

