Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission advances Oxford Road PUD amendment on first reading, replacing planned grocer with bank
Summary
The commission voted 4–0 on Jan. 26 to advance Ordinance 26-1631, a PUD amendment for roughly 4.48 acres at Oxford Road and State Road 436 to allow three quick-service restaurants and a bank in place of a previously planned grocer; staff said utilities will be provided by Seminole County and no school‑impact review was required.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Casselberry City Commission on Jan. 26 voted 4–0 to advance Ordinance 26-1631 on first reading, approving an amendment to the planned unit development (PUD) for the Oxford redevelopment at the southeast corner of Oxford Road and State Road 436.
Planner Hunter McFerrin described the site as roughly 4.48 acres located within the Oxford Park Overlay District and said the amended concept plan replaces a previously planned grocer with a bank and keeps three quick-service restaurants. McFerrin said the concept plan has been reviewed by staff and approved by the community development director and planning and zoning commission, and that public notice was provided in December 2025 to property owners within 500 feet.
Staff analysis concluded the amendment conforms with the comprehensive plan and mixed-use zoning objectives, and McFerrin said police services will come from the city while fire services will be provided by the county. He also said Seminole County will provide utilities to the site and that no school‑impact analysis was required because the project is nonresidential.
Commissioners asked questions about the property's annexation status and utility connections; staff confirmed the property is within the city limits but currently will rely on county water and sewer. No members of the public spoke during the public comment period.
Commissioner Bush moved to approve the ordinance on first reading; the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote, recorded as 4–0. The ordinance will return for a subsequent reading for final adoption.
