Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Bess topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norfolk Planning Board delays decision on Pond Street solar and battery project after stormwater, hazard‑mitigation concerns
Summary
The board continued the public hearing for a modified site plan at Pond Street that adds large‑scale solar and battery storage after town staff reported stormwater control failures and third‑party reviews flagged missing hazard‑mitigation information. The hearing was continued to Aug. 11; an emergency meeting was offered if outstanding items are addressed first.
The Norfolk Planning Board on Tuesday declined to close the public hearing for a modified site plan at 909 Pond Street that would add a large‑scale, ground‑mounted solar array and battery storage, citing outstanding hazard‑mitigation questions and observed stormwater violations.
A project representative urged the board to close the hearing and proceed. “I believe we satisfied every question we’ve had from the board,” the project representative said, asking the board to consider closing the hearing if possible. Planning staff and the board, however, said the record still shows unresolved items in the third‑party review and documentation gaps in the hazard mitigation analysis.
“Jensen Hughes’ latest document shows only yellow and red — no greens — which means additional information is needed,” a committee member noted, summarizing the peer reviewer’s status coding. Town staff also reported field problems. “I did walk the site after a rainstorm, identified multiple issues that were in violation of the SWIP,” a staff member said. “It’s running off the site. There’s sediment on the street. The silt fence and straw wattles are failing.”
Board members discussed which items could be conditioned for later resolution (for example, items to be handled through the building‑permit process or by the fire chief) and which required action before closing the hearing. One member suggested that a short list of small edits to the hazard‑mitigation plan could turn several reviewer flags to green, while staff reported outstanding site work that must be completed or conditioned for enforcement.
The board gave the applicant a concrete list of next steps: address the items listed in the most recent SWIP report, install a temporary construction fence, and submit the outstanding hazard‑mitigation materials. The board voted to continue the Pond Street public hearing to Aug. 11 at 7 p.m. and offered to hold an emergency meeting before that date if the applicant can demonstrate the required items have been completed.
The public hearing remains open; the board said it will consider a draft decision only after receiving the updated hazard‑mitigation analysis, documentation of required site controls and any peer‑review follow‑up.
