Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Va National Golf Course topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays vote on proposed Virginia Beach National sale after hours of public testimony
Summary
After lengthy public comments opposing the proposed sale and redevelopment of the Virginia Beach National Golf Course and questions about process and environmental impacts, council voted 11–0 to defer consideration to Aug. 11.
Mayor Mary Dyer opened the council’s discussion of a proposed sale and redevelopment of the city‑owned Virginia Beach National (VBN) golf course by reading a prepared statement that framed the sale as a strategic option to reduce city liabilities and increase housing supply, but said the council would postpone the public hearing and vote to allow further public input. "The decision to delay... allows more time for the public to express their opinion before a major decision is made by council," the mayor said.
The deferral followed nearly three hours of public comment. Dozens of speakers packed the chamber and WebEx line, with many urging council to pause or deny the Dragas proposal on grounds that the process had lacked transparency and that the plan would harm habitats and increase traffic. "This deal is textbook corruption... The outcome was determined before the RFP was ever issued," said Matthew Hamaker, a resident and former government teacher. Several neighborhood and advisory groups, including the Transition Area/Inner Facility Traffic Area Citizens Advisory Committee, submitted letters urging denial or further study, citing conflicts with the Imagine VB 2040 comprehensive plan and concerns about stormwater and infrastructure.
Opponents also noted that federal litigation had been filed challenging aspects of the process; speakers urged council to wait for legal clarity before transferring the property. Supporters of redevelopment argued the project would deliver jobs, housing and investments in course renovations.
Council action: by unanimous vote (11–0) the council deferred the item to its August 11 meeting. Council member Barbara Henley moved the deferral; the motion passed after discussion that the postponement created time for additional analysis, public engagement and answers to outstanding questions.
Why it matters: the VBN site is roughly 300 acres of public land. Any transfer or major redevelopment raises questions about long‑term public benefit, environmental protections (speakers said two bald‑eagle nests are on or near the site), infrastructure costs and appropriate public process. The deferral keeps the matter on the docket while allowing more time for documents, FOIA requests and community review.
What to watch: the council will revisit the sale/term sheet on Aug. 11. In the meantime, opponents have filed a federal complaint and citizens have asked staff to provide additional background on valuations, environmental reviews and traffic/stormwater modeling.
