Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voting And Recusal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board weighs voting, recusal and remote‑voting rules; zoning votes flagged special
Summary
Members reviewed draft rules requiring members to vote unless excused, debated whether a refusal to vote should count as a negative on zoning matters, and agreed to add clear language about alternates, quorum and remote participation.
The Southport Planning Board devoted substantial time on Oct. 29 to how votes, recusals and remote participation will be treated under the proposed rules of procedure. The Chair read draft language stating that every member must vote unless excused by the remaining members, and that members with conflicts customarily recuse themselves and may leave the table to avoid any appearance of bias.
Members were particularly concerned about a paragraph that treats a member’s refusal to vote on zoning matters as a recorded negative vote. “That’s Abundance and caution,” the Chair said, and several members asked staff to find the relevant statutory citation before keeping that provision in the rules. One member explained the rationale: zoning affects property rights and therefore a non‑vote can have outsized effect; recording it as negative prevents a minority from blocking action by simply refusing to vote.
The board also clarified alternates’ role: alternates may sit in when members are absent to preserve quorum, and the group discussed remote voting and whether remote presence counts as being “present” for quorum and voting purposes. Several members favored adding explicit language to include remote access so that participation by video or phone counts toward quorum.
Why it matters: Voting and recusal rules determine how planning decisions are reached and protect procedural fairness, particularly on high‑stakes zoning matters. The board agreed to remove the unsettled paragraph about non‑votes on zoning until staff can supply a statutory reference and to add clearer language about alternates and remote attendance.
Next steps: Staff will research the statutory basis for the zoning non‑vote language, return citations to the board, and include remote‑participation language in the next draft for review on Nov. 6.
