Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves expedited 'job-creation' zoning amendment requiring 200 net new jobs
Summary
The committee approved ZTA 2605 to create a 'job creation project' expedited review path that requires a project to generate at least 200 net new on-site jobs within two years and meet one of several qualifying tests (identified in the county strategic plan, be in specified industries or be a headquarters/nonprofit, or have received incentives). Planning raised capacity concerns but the committee adopted clarifying amendments and verification steps.
The Planning, Housing, and Parks Committee on July 13 approved Zoning Text Amendment 2605 to establish a "job creation project" expedited-review pathway aimed at attracting major employers.
Council staff described two alternative ways to qualify: (1) be identified in the county economic development strategic plan or have received county/state funding or incentives, or (2) employ at least 200 employees on-site within two years of obtaining a use-and-occupancy permit. Chair Fridson and the Council President framed the measure as a tool to spur substantial job growth and linked the effort to broader housing and workforce strategies.
The committee debated several technical points and amendments. Planning Director Jason Sartori told the committee the goal should be parity with other zoning processes and warned that if the definition were too loose the county could be overwhelmed by expedited applications: "if we make this too loose and too open that we're gonna be flooded with these, and a lot of things will qualify," he said. Planning staff also urged clarity about whether the 200 threshold referred to net new jobs and whether multi-tenant buildings could qualify.
Committee members adopted a set of clarifications: the job-creation standard will require at least 200 net new on-site jobs within two years; multi-tenant buildings may qualify provided at least one tenant meets the criteria; the industry list was revised to name biohealth, advanced technology, life sciences and hospitality, and to include headquarters or nonprofit headquarters as a qualifying category; and DPS will be added to employment-verification responsibilities. Staff explained "net new jobs" means new positions to the county (so a simple relocation of existing county jobs would not count toward the 200-job minimum).
Planning cautioned that expanding expedited review risks straining review capacity because other agencies must perform environmental and transportation reviews within shortened timelines. The Council President responded that the county must be aggressive to attract strategic firms and promised to pursue additional planning resources if application volumes grow.
The committee also discussed enforcement if a company fails to meet commitments; planning had proposed removing future expedited eligibility for repeat noncompliance while staff and members preferred a less punitive first response, suggesting cost-recovery or repayment only if noncompliance becomes chronic.
After debate the committee approved ZTA 2605 as amended. The clerk reported three votes in favor and none opposed. The chair praised the council president and external partners, and staff said MCEDC would coordinate early notice to planning on recruitments.
