Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Salem City Council urges lifting of statewide ban on rent stabilization; resolution passes 9-2
Summary
After extended debate and public testimony, the Salem City Council voted 9-2 on July 9 to adopt a resolution urging the state to lift the ban on local rent-stabilization and to pair stabilization with policies to increase housing production.
The Salem City Council voted 9-2 on July 9 to adopt a resolution expressing the citys support for lifting the statewide ban on local rent stabilization and urging state lawmakers to pursue complementary housing-production reforms.
The resolution, introduced by Councilor King and brought forward by the Committee on Community and Economic Development, was amended in committee to align its language with recent state legislative developments. Councilors discussed substituting a fixed cap with a formula tied to the consumer price index and clarified that stabilization must be paired with local and state efforts to unlock new housing production.
Public testimony framed the vote as urgent. Skyler Clark, a longtime activist, said the citys no-camping ordinance and the recent closure of the LifeBridge transition center have left people without shelter and that lax local policy contributed to the death of a friend: “I am confident that she would be alive today if she could be with the community that could have supported her,” Clark said. Several other commenters, including Craig McGehee and Tiffany Roberts, voiced strong public support for rent-stabilization measures and urged the council to act.
Council debate mixed policy and procedural concerns. Supporters, including Councilor King, emphasized the councils role in advocating for tools to protect tenants and preserve community stability; Councilor Prozniewski noted the extensive public engagement and committee work. Councilor Sidorak proposed additional language tying stabilization to housing production and specific state bills; that amendment was modified and ultimately not adopted as proposed, but the council did adopt a pair of paragraphs affirming that stabilization should be paired with measures to increase housing supply.
The final roll call on the resolution recorded nine votes in favor and two against. The councils action is a nonbinding statement of the citys position directed to state lawmakers; any municipal authority to adopt local rent stabilization would depend on future state legislation. The council did not take further local regulatory action at the July 9 meeting beyond the adopted resolution.
