Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Shelter topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant presents animal shelter design; council presses on operations and costs
Summary
Consultants from CES Bridge presented site plans and preliminary cost estimates for a proposed Marysville animal shelter. Council pressed about ventilation, daily operations, staffing, adoption processes, and the shelter’s operating costs vs. fee revenue.
Get email alerts on the Animal Shelter topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CES Bridge representatives presented updated construction documents and a site plan for the proposed Marysville animal shelter, describing a shifted building footprint, nine kennel spaces, dog runs, isolation pads, and finish materials. The consultant said site surveying and high-level foundation and building sections are complete and recommended hiring mechanical, electrical and structural subconsultants next.
On preliminary cost, the presenter said, "I think we were kind of in the $2.75, you know, $2.75 to maybe $3.10 or $3.20 range" in a high-level exercise and contrasted that with an alternate full concrete approach the consultant estimated at roughly $360,000–$400,000.
Council members asked whether ventilation and mechanical systems would be addressed in the next stage. The consultant said MEP engineers will be brought on to address ventilation and other systems. Council also raised operational questions: who would staff and manage the facility, whether volunteers could reliably cover daily cleaning and care, licensing revenue, and adoption and surrender policies.
City staff confirmed the current adoption deposit practice: adopters pay a deposit that is returned (said staff) if they provide proof that the animal has been spayed or neutered; staff said the refund amount is $200. Staff estimated annual dog-license revenue in the range of $2,500–$3,000 and noted that animal-control operating costs exceed current fee revenue.
Why it matters: The capital project is closely linked to long-term operational commitments. Council emphasized the need to plan for operations—staffing, volunteer support, licensing enforcement—and interim housing and licensing while construction proceeds.
What’s next: Consultants will proceed with hiring MEP and structural subconsultants, finalize bid specifications and provide cost estimates; staff will return with a plan for interim operations, licensing numbers and a timeline for planning commission review (likely August).

