Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Disability Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pittsburgh commission opposes federal guidance limiting integration mandate; plans code changes and public outreach on service/support animals
Summary
Director Rachel Shepherd said the commission strongly opposes recent federal guidance interpreting Section 504 and the ADA as not requiring integration; the commission plans code updates, license-form self-attestation for owner-trained service animals, and community trainings including an Aug. 8 webinar.
Director Rachel Shepherd told the commission that a recent Department of Justice memo interpreting Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act “as whether there is a mandate... the short story of that is that they're saying no, there is no mandate,” language she said the commission strongly opposes.
Shepherd cited the 1999 Olmstead decision and warned that the DOJ memo could reduce federally driven requirements for integrating people with disabilities into the community. "We strongly oppose that," she said, noting the commission receives a large share of disability-related cases and will continue local enforcement under Pittsburgh city code.
Council members and staff framed practical next steps. Shepherd said staff will update the commission’s portion of city code where the term "support animal" is used inconsistently, and they are working with the Department of Finance to permit owner-trained service-animal self-attestation on dog-license forms so owner-trained animals can have license-fee waivers without burdensome medical documentation.
Participant remarks at the meeting flagged legal risks. One attendee who had attended the John Marshall Law School symposium said experienced housing attorneys expect "a flurry of lawsuits" challenging federal guidance on emotional-support animals. Commissioner Kyle (commenting as a landlord/developer attorney) emphasized that landlords must still apply a reasonableness analysis before denying a support-animal request, and that there is no guaranteed right to an emotional-support animal in housing.
Shepherd described operational implications: the commission will continue to accept local housing complaints under Pittsburgh city code even where HUD will no longer accept certain support-animal cases under its federal processes; staff are scheduling a community webinar on Aug. 8 and other outreach to help landlords, tenants and service providers navigate accommodation requests.
Shepherd also reviewed enforcement metrics in the same report: 91 open investigations, 41 pending intakes, 12 cases awaiting assignment, 10 mandatory conciliations, and three cases currently in court.
The commission did not take a formal vote on federal guidance at this meeting but recorded its opposition and laid out code and outreach changes to address the policy shift.
