Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Denali Borough School District reviews midyear MAP growth, board discusses literacy and pandemic effects
Summary
Superintendent Dan led a work session on midyear MAP assessments showing districtwide median growth in math around 61%. Board members and staff used a "notice and wonders" protocol to surface questions about comprehension vs. structural items, pandemic cohort effects, and diagnostic next steps for teachers.
Superintendent Dan presented midyear Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) reports for grades 3–9 at a board work session and guided members through a "notice and wonders" exercise asking them to identify factual observations and questions about the data. He explained that MAP reports both achievement and growth, and showed districtwide distributions and a median growth marker; in the math snapshot he cited a district median growth figure of about 61%.
Board members and staff raised several substantive interpretations and follow-up items. One board member noted relatively strong math growth alongside middling achievement, while others flagged declining performance in certain grade bands and asked whether cohorts who were young during the COVID-19 pandemic show lingering effects. A participant asked whether the MAP emphasizes comprehension or structural decoding; Dan and others said the MAP is a growth-oriented screening tool but that it is not hyper-specific for diagnostic gaps, and recommended targeted diagnostic tests to drill down on particular skill areas.
"When teachers look at the student-level results they see patterns in class work and can target interventions," Dan said, describing how focused interventions have produced measurable gains in classroom diagnostics. Another board member raised the possibility that younger readers might produce inaccurate responses simply because they struggle to interpret test text, a concern the group tied to instructional practice.
Participants discussed how the district uses multiple assessments in the early grades: a state language assessment for K–3 (referenced as part of the Laska Reads Act) that omits some comprehension components, and MAP/AK STAR results that do include other measures. Dan cautioned against assuming that different assessments are interchangeable and said the district had adjusted instruction where mismatches were evident.
The work session emphasized next steps rather than final conclusions: members recommended targeted diagnostic assessments to identify specific skill gaps (phoneme awareness, fluency, comprehension), continuing teacher reflection and collaboration, and using MAP growth measures as a guide to where to focus interventions. The board did not take formal action; Dan said staff will continue to refine diagnostic follow-ups and report updates to the board.
