Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Goldsboro council approves CDBG-CV reallocation to Bridal Multi Sports lighting over resident objections

Goldsboro City Council · July 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a public hearing and resident concerns about location, the City Council approved a substantial amendment reallocating remaining CDBG-CV funds to new lighting at the Bridal Multi Sports Complex to improve safety and enable socially distanced recreation; vote recorded with five affirmatives and one abstention.

Planning Director Miss Wood told the council that HUD requires a formal amendment whenever previously unallocated CDBG-CV funds are assigned to a new eligible activity. Staff proposed assigning $292,378.83 (remaining funds from a $427,303 2020 allocation) to a lighting and public-facility project at the Bridal Multi Sports Complex to improve trail safety and broaden recreation opportunities.

Resident Phyllis Merritt James urged the council to prioritize investments inside the city and in neighborhoods lacking grocery and basic services, calling the Bridal complex “on the outskirts” and less accessible to residents without transportation. "I wish we would have allocated it where the people in the city who really need access to expanded services and walking trails ... should have been considered," she said.

Council members and staff responded that the proposed site qualifies as an LMI (low- to moderate-income) area and that parks-and-recreation staff had identified likely benefits to children and families who attend events there. Council member comments requested increased public-facing information about how the decision was reached and a fuller summary at the next public meeting.

The council moved to approve the substantial amendment; the minutes record the vote as five affirmatives and one abstention. Staff said the public meeting on the amendment would be held the following day and the amendment must be drawn down by Sept. 10 before HUD submittal.