Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Summer School Literacy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board debates summer-school targeting after staff limit program to students "on the cusp"

Talbot County Board of Education · March 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent Dr. P. said the summer program targeted students most likely to move into proficiency to meet a 5% K–2 literacy growth goal; several board members criticized excluding low-red (most in-need) students and asked for greater board involvement in program parameters and budget planning.

Superintendent Dr. P. updated the Talbot County Board of Education on the district’s summer-school model on July 15, saying students were pretested and the program targeted learners most likely to move into proficiency to meet a board goal of increasing K–2 literacy performance by 5 percentage points.

Several board members pushed back, saying the approach excluded students at the lowest proficiency levels who are often the most in need of intervention. “So why then again are we leaving out students on the low end of the red scale when they would be considered our most in-need learners?” one member asked. Staff explained the choice was made to maximize measured proficiency gains with constrained funds and noted that interventions during the school year (reading teachers, instructional assistants) will be emphasized to support students needing intensive services.

Board members requested that future summer programming and budgeting decisions involve the full board earlier, asked staff to examine grant opportunities to expand summer and year-round supports, and urged clearer reporting on follow-up and outcomes for students who participated. One board member noted examples from other districts where grant writers generated significant funding and recommended the district consider adding grant-writing capacity.

No immediate change to the summer program was voted; board members asked staff to bring more data and budgeting options to an upcoming workshop and to consider equity and year-round strategies as part of future budget cycles.