Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Internal Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates minutes format and police training payback agreements
Summary
Councilors debated whether minutes should list only speakers or include non-speaking employees and discussed the legality and structure of payback agreements for officers sent to the police academy, with some councilors urging staff review before adopting enforceable terms.
At its Feb. 10 meeting, the Ruidoso Downs City Council spent time debating how meeting minutes should record participation and whether the city can require officers who attend the police academy to repay training costs if they leave.
A councilor asked that minutes for the Jan. 27 meeting be amended to list employees and appointed officials who attended even if they did not speak. The council’s long-standing practice, defended by a member of the clerk’s office, has been to list only those who participate verbally in the meeting. The council discussed consistency with past practice and the administrative burden of listing employees who arrive late or leave early.
"When we were trained to do the minutes, we were trained to only list the people that participate in the meetings," the city clerk explained during the discussion. A councilor said she would like minutes to reflect more complete participation but acknowledged the operational difficulty of doing so.
Separately, councilors discussed sending new officers to the police academy and possible repayment arrangements for training costs. One councilor proposed a multi-year, prorated payback plan — for example, a four- or five-year cap where the officer would reimburse a portion of training costs if they left early. "A good example is if he cost $8,000 to state 4 years, then he's gonna have and he believes in 2 years, he owes us $4,000," the councilor said while outlining a prorated approach.
Other members said they recalled legal reviews finding such repayment agreements difficult to enforce and suggested staff and the city attorney review current practice and any proposed contract language before the council adopts a policy. Councilors also stressed caution about discussing individual personnel matters in open session and deferred details to HR processes where appropriate.
The council ultimately left minutes and personnel procedures for further administrative handling and moved on to new business. No formal payback policy was adopted at the meeting; councilors asked staff to research legal enforceability and bring options back for future consideration.
