Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Goldsboro Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sanford debates Goldsboro Redevelopment Entertainment Arts Track, proposes advisory board and $75,000 seed
Summary
City staff brought a draft resolution for a Goldsboro Redevelopment Entertainment Arts Track that would fund façades, festivals and limited corridor infrastructure; commissioners discussed board composition, term lengths, eligibility and a tentative $75,000 city commitment.
City staff presented a draft resolution on July 13 proposing a Goldsboro Redevelopment Entertainment Arts Track to support façade improvements, festivals and limited amenity-style infrastructure along historic Goldsboro Boulevard.
The presenter said the program area would be limited to corridor frontage and that staff intends to use an existing CRA grant-application form for applicants. The draft also calls for creation of a Historic Goldsboro Advisory Board to oversee the program; staff recommended an inaugural slate of nominees be presented when the final resolution returns to the Commission in 2–4 weeks.
Commissioners debated eligibility criteria (Goldsboro residents, property owners or business owners), appointment methods and term lengths. Several commissioners preferred four-year terms to align with other boards, while others favored shorter chair terms to allow skills development. The Commission reached consensus to nominate board members and vote on the full slate rather than have individual commissioners make unilateral appointments.
Staff said about $75,000 had been tentatively earmarked for the program subject to Commission approval, and noted the corridor has private investment potential (staff referenced an anticipated redevelopment project near Holly and historic Goldsboro that could complement the grant program). Staff also indicated they will coordinate implementation with Goldsboro Main Street and existing neighborhood groups and will seek to minimize additional meeting burdens by aligning advisory meetings with existing schedules when practical.
What’s next: staff will return with a final resolution and the inaugural nomination class for Commission consideration in roughly 2–4 weeks. Commissioners asked staff to refine boundary language, confirm term lengths and provide a clear description of eligible projects before the final vote.
