Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Syringe Service Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clackamas County directs staff to explore syringe disposal boxes and research legal examples for proposed SSP buffer ordinance

Clackamas County Board of Commissioners · July 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After broad discussion of a draft ordinance limiting syringe service program operations near schools, the board directed staff to study public syringe collection and disposal boxes and asked county counsel to research legal precedents and national examples (including ADA considerations); both motions passed 5–0.

Mary Rumbaugh and Assistant County Counsel Andrew Naylor returned to the board for a third policy session on a proposed ordinance addressing syringe service programs (SSPs). Staff said prior drafts focused on mobile SSPs and that the current draft includes both fixed and mobile locations and a proposed 1,000‑foot buffer from schools for "prohibited activities." Naylor said the ordinance could include a set of exemptions — for example medical facilities or public‑health emergency responses — and that enforcement would require updates to code enforcement provisions.

Rumbaugh noted enforcement and staffing tradeoffs: enforcement would fall to the county's environmental health team and could require shifting staff from other responsibilities, potentially delaying other permitting and program work. She also said opioid settlement funds would not be an allowable funding source for ordinance enforcement.

Commissioners discussed alternatives including expanding syringe disposal infrastructure. Commissioner Savas moved to direct staff to further explore adding public syringe collection and disposal boxes in strategic locations; the board approved the motion 5–0. Commissioner Savas then moved for staff and county counsel to research national examples, ADA implications and to consult organizations such as the Foundation for Drug Policy Solutions; the board also approved that motion 5–0.

Staff said the enforcement model in the draft ordinance is complaint‑driven and focused on littering behavior rather than barring individuals from accessing services.