Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Demolition 234 4th topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic zoning commission approves demolition of accessory building at 234 4th Avenue North after divided vote
Summary
The Franklin Historic Zoning Commission voted to allow demolition of an accessory structure at 234 4th Avenue North despite staff recommendations to deny; commissioners cited floodplain exposure, alterations to the building and safety concerns in a split, at-times technical debate.
The Franklin Historic Zoning Commission approved a demolition application for an accessory building at 234 4th Avenue North after a divided and sometimes contentious discussion.
Staff had recommended denying the demolition application, saying demolition is “highly discouraged” and permitted only when one or more narrow criteria are met — for example, demonstrated structural instability or an established loss of historic integrity. Staff also noted the building’s age and its inclusion in National Register materials but flagged that the structure’s historical significance and integrity were uncertain.
At the public podium, Greg Gamble of Kimley-Horn, representing the property owners, argued the building has been altered and lacks architectural significance, and that its floodplain location makes it a liability. “We believe it's a liability to the owner. We believe it's a liability to the city of Franklin,” Gamble said, describing the building’s altered condition and flood risk.
Commissioners debated the National Register listing, whether changes over time had removed the building’s integrity and what demolition would allow the owners to do on the site afterward. Legal staff advised commissioners that the body’s determination about whether the structure is historic affects post-demolition zoning outcomes and future site uses.
An initial motion to deny demolition (per staff recommendation) failed; a subsequent motion to approve demolition — made by Madeline and seconded by Angela — carried. The commission chair announced that the motion to approve demolition carried.
What it means: The vote clears the way for the property owners to pursue demolition permits, but staff and commissioners noted that future site work will need to comply with applicable zoning rules and any limitations tied to the property’s district status. The commission also signaled that documentation and permitting steps and any follow‑up approvals related to site redevelopment remain necessary and subject to city review.
The commission took the demolition vote by voice/hand and did not record a roll-call tally in the public transcript.
